Attempts to adopt a high-profile scientific study into the COP24 climate talks in the Polish city of Katowice have failed.
The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report on the impact of a temperature rise of 1.5°C was major news when it was published in October.
Scientists and delegates were shocked as the delegations from the US, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait objected to “welcoming” the study.
Instead, they said the conference would “take note” of the study.
Robin Lacassin tweeted: “The axis of evil at #COP24: USA, Russia, Saudi Arabia.”
The 2015 climate conference in Paris commissioned the study which said the planet was now completely off track, heading for a 3°C rise this century.
Keeping rises below 1.5 °C required “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”, the report said.
Emissions of CO2 would have to be reduced by 45 per cent by 2030, it said.
Four times more people in the world are displaced by extreme weather than by conflict, the UN reported.
The report won praise from politicians across the world and many countries have expressed frustration in Katowice. “It’s not about one word or another, it is us being in a position to welcome a report we commissioned in the first place,” said Ruenna Haynes from the Caribbean islands of St Kitts and Nevis.
“If there is anything ludicrous about the discussion, it’s that we can’t welcome the report,” she said to applause.
Scientists and campaigners were also disappointed by the oil-producers’ veto.
“Climate science is not a political football,” said Camilla Born of the think tank E3G. “All the world’s governments, Saudi included, agreed the 1.5°C report and we deserve the truth. Saudi can’t argue with physics, the climate will keep on changing.”
Delegates hope that ministers, who arrive tomorrow (Monday), will be able to revive the report.
Recommendations delivered to the 197 parties at COP24 include proposals on contingency planning, consultation and data analysis and cooperation among countries.
Next week they will be presented for adoption at ministerial level next week.
“The goal is really to help countries understand the scale of what is coming and really prepare for it,” the UN climate change report said. “It’s really about finding ways to reduce the suffering and ensure the safety, dignity of the people at risk of displacement in the face of climate change.”
Oil well fires rage outside Kuwait in 1991 in the Gulf War. Kuwait’s economy is dependent on the consumption of fossil fuels. Picture credit: Good Free Pictures
Quotes: “Attempts to take a large-scale scientific study during the climate negotiations of the COP24 in the Polish city of Katowice failed.”
“The report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) on the impact of a 1.5 ° C temperature increase was the main news when it was published in October.”
And what decisions were expected to take at COP24? – At the summit there were no active ecologists who could present their programs. At the summit there were no engineers who could implement these programs. Politicians and public figures gathered who, due to the lack of technical education, could not take technical decisions. From here – and the lack of adequate funding – no one in non-existent programs will not give money. And the transition to the mode of raising the temperature by 1.5 ° C is not a program. This is an unsubstantiated intention, leading humanity to a catastrophe.
The answer to the decision made in Katowice will not have to wait long – its total absence of a positive result will be shown by the heat waves that will come to Europe and the world from April to November 2019.
Once again I remind you: Warming and all types of disasters are eliminated by multipurpose programs. They involve natural technologies that have proven their effectiveness over many millions of years. Plus, the latest human technology, plus stabilizers. The elimination period is 10 years. The costs that will be returned to sponsors with an income of 2.4-2.7 dollars per dollar invested are two trillion dollars. That is, with the elimination of global warming, sponsors will receive about five trillion dollars in net income.
And one more plus: Not a single coal company will be closed in the world. My programs are able to eliminate all emissions with a large margin.
Sincerely, environmental programs developer, Victor Rodin. Ukraine. Khmelnitsky NPP. Tel. Kiev Star: 961336344. Mail: dorosydos@gmail.com, rodinviktor@lenta.ru
— — —
Цитаты: «Попытки принять масштабное научное исследование в ходе переговоров по климату COP24 в польском городе Катовице потерпели неудачу».
«Доклад МГЭИК (Межправительственная группа экспертов по изменению климата) о воздействии повышения температуры на 1,5 ° C был главной новостью, когда он был опубликован в октябре».
А какие решения ожидали принять на COP24? – На саммите не было действующих экологов, которые могли бы представить свои программы. На саммите не было инженеров, которые могли бы эти программы реализовать. Собрались политики и общественные деятели, которые в силу отсутствия технического образования, не могли принять технических решений. Отсюда – и отсутствие должного финансирования – никто в несуществующие программы денег не даст. А переход в режим повышения температуры на 1,5 ° C – это не программа. Это ничем не обоснованное намерение, ведущая человечество к катастрофе.
Ответ на принятое в Катовице решения ждать придётся недолго – его полное отсутствие положительного результата покажут тепловые волны, которые будут приходить в Европу и мир из Африки с апреля по ноябрь 2019 года.
Ещё раз напоминаю: Потепление и все виды катаклизмов устраняются многоцелевыми программами. В них участвуют природные технологии, показавшие свою эффективность в течение многих миллионов лет. Плюс, новейшие человечески технологии, плюс стабилизаторы. Срок устранения – 10 лет. Затраты, которые вернутся спонсорам с доходом в 2,4-2,7 доллара на вложенный доллар, – два триллиона долларов. То есть, при устранении глобального потепления, спонсоры получат порядка пяти триллионов долларов чистого дохода.
И ещё один плюс: В мире не будет закрыто ни одно угольное предприятие. Мои программы способны ликвидировать все выбросы с большим запасом.